Doctorcrypto About RSS Subscribe
Doctorcrypto
Home › Latest › Australia Sues Telegram for $38M Over ‘Pro-Terror’ Videos
Latest

Australia Sues Telegram for $38M Over ‘Pro-Terror’ Videos

By Diego Whitfield · · 2 min read

Australia's online safety regulator has launched legal action against Telegram, seeking penalties of up to A$38 million over the messaging platform's alleged failure to properly detect and remove violent extremist content on its service.

The Allegations Against Telegram

The eSafety Commissioner has accused Telegram of neglecting its obligations to identify and take down material tied to some of the deadliest recent mass shootings, including the 2019 Christchurch mosque attacks in New Zealand and the 2022 Buffalo supermarket shooting in the United States.

Regulators contend that the platform did not put adequate systems in place to flag content that celebrated or promoted terrorism, allowing such material to remain accessible to users. The case centers on whether Telegram met the transparency and safety standards expected under Australian online safety law.

The regulator argues that platforms cannot look the other way when extremist content spreads on their networks.

The legal filing represents one of the more aggressive moves by Australian authorities to hold a major messaging platform accountable for the content circulating among its users.

A Wider Push on Platform Accountability

The action against Telegram fits into a broader pattern of Australian regulators pressuring technology companies to strengthen their content moderation and cooperate with official information requests. The eSafety Commissioner has increasingly leaned on financial penalties as a tool to compel compliance.

Telegram has often positioned itself as a platform prioritizing privacy and minimal intervention, a stance that has repeatedly put it at odds with governments seeking greater oversight of harmful material.

Key points in the dispute include:

  • Penalties sought reach up to A$38 million
  • Content linked to the Christchurch and Buffalo attacks is central to the case
  • The action underscores growing regulatory scrutiny of messaging apps

The outcome could set a significant precedent for how strictly online platforms operating in Australia are expected to police extremist material going forward.

Was this useful?👍 Yes👎 No